November, 2003-?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
01.19.04 Analysis: Dean wows crowd, trails in polls, sieff
Dean's Complaints on Press Indicate Coverage Gone Negative , jurkowitz 01.16.04
Perfect Storm Sweeps Into Iowa for Dean , mcroberts 01.15.04
American Splendor: Dean's Wife Is The Anti-Laura, dowd 01.13.04
Must Dean Serve "Political Pablum" To Satisfy The Media?, cohen The Scotsman US War College Blasts 'Strategic Error' of Iraq Invasion, scotsman 01.11.04
Dean Confirms Tax Cut Plan , kranish 01.09.04
Dean Won't Become President Unless He Learns How To Speak To Working Class, Rurals ,dionne 01.08.04
Shrink Rap: When Is Dean Going To Spill His Guts, Like Politicians Are Supposed To Do? ,marcus 01.07.04
Dean Has Not Put Out The Fires Of Muckraking Enemies ,nyt ed 01.06.04
Dean to Make Surprise Visit to N.H. , johnson 01.03.04
Dean's Blunt Talk About Race , jackson, 01.02.04
Democratic rivals turn their fire on 'erratic' Dean
, cornwell
Why DEAN WATCH? Ever since we put up a DEAN WATCH page last week, we've been getting pro and con letters: either the page is supporting Dean or attacking him, we're told. Actually, it's neither. Since Dean is presently the Dem front-runner, we thought it appropriate to provide more information on his candidacy, both pro and con. Other letters simply asked us what we think about Dean, who would we like to see as the Dem nominee to challenge Bush. While we have no horse in the Dem race, our concern has always been to have the Dems field the person with the best chance of beating Bush. But that may not happen. The received knowledge is that a re-election campaign for president (Bush was elected by the Supreme Court) forces the party on the outs to either decide to challenge a weak president with a moderate candidate or to gather together the grassroots for the next election by nominating someone who will particularly appeal to the (left or right) wing of the party. Dean is trying to be both, which is what Bush did. Dean's appeal right now is not to the boys in the backroom of the Dem Party, but to the younger, more educated, net-savvy, angry progressives. His background, however, is more moderate than many of his followers, and as the campaign moves from the primaries to the general election, Dean, if he is the nominee, will move more toward the center. How far toward the center will depend upon the financial backing of the boys in the backroom. If the full bulk of the Dem Party gets behind Dean, his job would be to appreal further to the moderate center while keeping his progressive base energized. That's when folks further left, like Nader, will likely get into the fight to carve away some Dean backing, thus strengthening Bush's hand. If, on the other hand, the backroom boys see nominee-Dean as a progressive loser to Bush, the financial backing will remain weak and Dean will become the darling of the progressive left, playing the Goldwater role. One way or the other, Hillary's recent visit to Iowa suggests that some of the moderate Dems may have given up on 2004 and expect to nominate a more moderate candidate when Bush returns to Crawfish, Texas for good. --Politex, 11.17.03
The reigning bogus good ole boy in public life remains our blue-blood president, an heir to large and aristocratic American fortunes on both the Bush and Walker sides of his family. Unlike his father, he is not about to be caught asking for "a splash more coffee." On the eve of his visit to London this week, he hit a characteristically phony note when he told an interviewer, "I never dreamt when I was living in Midland, Texas, that I would be staying in Buckingham Palace." Mr. Bush, who was born in New Haven, lived in Midland until only the age of 15 before moving on to such hick venues as Andover, Yale and Harvard when not vacationing in family compounds in Kennebunkport, Me., or Jupiter Island, a tony neighbor of Palm Beach.
Rich Democrats vying to replace him are merely less effective purveyors of the same aw-shucks nonsense. John Kerry is a Boston Brahmin (Mother was a Forbes) and a multi-millionaire in his own right before marrying a half-a-billionaire. Like the president, he's a Yalie (via St. Paul's in his case). But in his desperation to save a campaign whose poll numbers are floundering as much as Martha Stewart's stock price, he has taken to shooting game and playing hockey with firemen in Iowa. He has traded in his Turnbull & Asser shirts for denim and his effete Ducati motorcycle for a Harley-Davidson like the one he rode onstage to the Leno show just as his top campaign executives fled. "I don't intend to challenge President Bush to a contest of who's a more regular guy," Mr. Kerry writes in his new campaign autobiography, "A Call to Service," even as he does so. In the same book, he boasts that he's "the son of a public employee" (in the diplomatic service) and "a charter member of one of the most selective but fastest-growing sports clubs in the world: the Nascar fans of Massachusetts."
Howard Dean is more forthright about his Yale (via St. George's) and Park Avenue pedigree, up to a point. On his Web site, a gathering place for smaller donors, his privileged upbringing goes unmentioned, and in the recent "Rock the Vote" debate on CNN he said he had gone to "a college in New Haven, Connecticut." But in his own campaign manifesto, "Winning Back America," he does own up to privilege before moving on to describe his youthful playground of East Hampton as a veritable Levittown with "people of every background living there throughout the year." In Dr. Dean's deft literary hands, months spent skiing in Aspen after winning a 1-Y deferment from Vietnam for a bad back becomes a "sojourn in the mountains," a quasi-spiritual quest tantamount to a stint in the Peace Corps, if not an ashram. -- Frank Rich, NYT, 11.23.03
I don't understand why Dean is the lead dem.æ At first, I just thought that he was getting most of the media spot light because rep knew that he wouldn't stand a chance to beat Bush in the 2004 election.æ Now I am not so sure.æ I don't think Dean is anything, let alone someone that can win coming next year.æ I think Kerry is hands down the strongest out of all the candidates, even rep. would have a hard time not voting for him, and if we are going to get Bush out of office we need to get behind him.æ --Rob.
***
Deanwatch?ææ Well, I just deleted your site from my favorites and until you represent the other national co-leader, Wes Clark, I can no longer support you. --TH
***
I agree with some of the comments, that it is a little TOO EARLY in the campaign to have only a "Dean Watch".æ Though he is the leader, it is not yet a done deal and the Dean Watch adds that level of finality to the race.
What I find most interesting is this: Dean is a moderate (of course people on his right view him on the left and visa versa, such is the problem with putting people on a LINE....
The current administration has turned its back on many of its own party planks--- balanced budget (no chance of THAT one), no new taxes (deficits are future taxes, someone is going to pay).æ By rallying around a centrist who supports the troops but NOT the war, who supports separation of church and state, who IS REACHING OUT for the worker against CHEAP LABOR, I think [Dems] can do well. --Bush Watch Reader
***
Why do you have Dean Watch? Dean doesn't need watching. --Mary
***
Why not have a Dean watch? People should be critical of everyone who wants to be president. If more people had been more critical in 2000æwe wouldn't be in the mess we're in.æ Dean is imperfect, as are they all.æ If having a Dean watch site helps peopleælearn more about Dean and the restæof the candidates, I think that's a great idea. Let's not let unreasoned devotion to a candidate mirror the unreasoned support of the current president. --Peter, Vermont
æ
***
I think that your "Bush Watch ... Today's Headlines" page is one of the most informative pages on the Internet - but, I would like to voice my opposition to your new "Dean Watch" section, which biases your political coverage in favor of Governor Dean. I am sure that there are many readers, like me, who support other candidates that must feel the same way. --Bob
***
I am very disturbed over your adding a Dean Watch.If the only goal you have is to get rid of Bush, having a Dean section may be appropriate, but if you are looking for a change in policies, Dean is not a good subject. He is not liberal, denies being a liberal, and supports or has supported almost all of Bush's policies, until they became unpopular enough for him to change his official position. By carrying a "Dean" section, you are giving tacit endorsement to Dean and to his conservative policy recommendations. Many of your readers want a change in policy as well as a change in leaders. --Ray
***
Dean Watch is a non-advocacy site paid for by Politex, a non-affiliated U.S. citizen.
|
||||||||||||||||||